Re: Cisco HFR

Tony Li wrote:

I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would undertake, and that would make some sense. However, I hope that they focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second. No point in porting what isn't stable.

I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-) Pete