29 Apr
2003
29 Apr
'03
2:15 p.m.
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Further to my earlier post.. a large global private network requiring unique space at many sites, they use 9/8 .. why not use 10/8 ??? (renumbering reasons aside that is!)
Recall the counter argument from Stephen Sprunk was that it needed a per site allocation from a registry, and yet these guys are managing just fine without it!
IBM uses the registry. They are alloted a 9/8, even if it is legacy. I do not know what addressing peers to the IBM networks use. I presume that some of them are not 9/8 addressing. -Jack