3 Feb
2011
3 Feb
'11
10:37 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves 1 rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively doubles your price anyways. :)
Not sure I understand that one.
/19 = 500 /29s
/32 = 64,000 /48s
Shouldn't the v6 blocks be a lot bigger?
Chris
Yes, they should be. Someone with a /19 would likely be looking at larger than a /32. Under proposal 121, it would be a /28, which would double the fee. I would imagine that the fee structure would have to change somehow, since /31 and /30, for example, won't even be an option. -Randy