I will admit, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw “T-1” ☺ Greg Dickinson Network Engineer [cid:image001.png@01D2DDE3.06E76B70] From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+greg.dickinson=bryantbank.com@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Ross Tajvar Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2023 10:42 PM To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: 1299 capacity constraints This Message originates from outside Bryant Bank. Please use caution when opening this correspondence, attachments or hyperlinks (URLs). If you have questions, please contact IT Support. Thank you. Someone else made this joke via direct email. Old minds think alike? On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com<mailto:mpetach@netflight.com>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar <ross@tajvar.io<mailto:ross@tajvar.io>> wrote: It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Whoa. I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for connectivity. Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in this day and age? ^_^; Matt NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, print, save, copy, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete copies. Thank you.