Peace,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> My proposal added the clarification that "majority" is understood as "over 50%".
And the proposal is denied to be unreasonable by Toma and, more
aggressively, by me.
Having seen my name being mentioned here, what I want to highlight is that:
1) I was asking that just out of idle curiosity;
2) The important context with this is that two people seem to be arguing about this: one (me) from the European Union, which is within the RIPE NCC region, and the other, apparently from the APNIC region, as far as the TLD in the email address could tell.
And we're discussing LACNIC policies within the mailing list that is mostly related to the operations within the ARIN region.
Though I definitely agree with certain points been made, this appears to be entirely off the topic of the NANOG, and I'm accepting the blame for raising this here.
--
Töma