Keith, I agree, we can't even get everyone including some LARGE ( I'll avoid Tier's because people get stupid around that too) networks to filter customers based on assigned netblocks. -jim On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf@dessus.com> wrote:
Without a concomitant increase in "trustworthy", assigning greater levels of trust is fools endeavour. Whatever this trusted network initiative is, I take that it was designed by fools or government (the two are usually indistinguishable) for the purpose of creating utterly untrustworthy networks.
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ramy Hashish Sent: Sunday, 24 May, 2015 22:49 To: morrowc.lists@gmail.com; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks
The idea of restricting access to a certain content during an attack on the "trusted networks" only will make all interested ISPs be more "trusted"
Ramy
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com> wrote:
However, the trusted network initiative might be a good approach to start influencing operators to apply anti-spoofing mechanisms.
explain how you think the 'trusted network initiative' matters in the slightest?
-chris