31 Jan
2002
31 Jan
'02
5:06 p.m.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money spent on this witch hunt.
At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
assuming that they pull the plug prior to warning the accussed offender of the problem. They'd get no false positive from me, that's for sure ;-) Guilty as charged here. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com