FYI He tells everyone they¹re cute. Don¹t buy his tricks, he doesn¹t call back the next morning. ;) Ps. Take it easy on each other. It¹s the beginning of spring.. Head outside.. Go have a beer.. Smoke a joint.. What I am getting at is.. It¹s possible you guys should relax and realize that in the grand scheme of things a lot of this really doesn¹t matter. Go be humans beings in the world, the internet and this flame thread will still be here as it has been for generations (internet generations, anyways..) Just my .02 WOOOOOSAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH On 3/24/14, 4:53 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN. ^^^ where do i do that? Nick Hilliard
ahh. i see your error. i am not nick hilliard. he's the cute one.
Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can be stateless."
again, you put words in my mouth which were not there. i did not say v6 to v4 translation.
Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day.
cool. then we can all go back to reality and whet people actually said.
bye
randy