On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Between a potential problem with privacy, and an actual problem with having my sessions redirected to the RBN, I'll take the privacy risk.
YMMV.
Depends on your priorities--and that of whoever owns the phone. You, or your employer. Gadi.
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:hannigan@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:13 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Gadi Evron; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony:Metasploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd)
Not so quick. Privacy policy?
-M<
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although I doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
Note: HD has not been compromised.
Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's
On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote: the time to
see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com