The quickest way of contacting the AOL Mail Team I'm aware of is through their Twitter account at @AOLMail (https://twitter.com/AOLMail). Tell them @6 sent you. ;) Cordially, A - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vox: +1 202 459 9800 x.1300 // secure: +1 410 874 0050 (phone calls need to be arranged in advance) e: adrian@2600.COM // e: adrian.lamo@us.army.mil GPG/PGP public key: https://keybase.io/comsec/key.asc PGP Fingerprint (64 bit): 324B EE81 A275 E619 (COMSEC First! Verify fingerprint before using key.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ El 2015-02-24 13:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian escribió:
And how many users do you have, again? On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, "Colin Johnston" <colinj@gt86car.org.uk> wrote:
block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification
colin
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:19:06AM +0100, Fred wrote: Having exactly the same issue. Also never received any response from AOL. Quite annoying.
I've been waiting since January 26th for a response from dmarc-help@teamaol.com, which is their stipulated contact point for DMARC issues.
Of course I wouldn't *need* a response about that if they hadn't implemented DMARC so foolishly.
It seems that the days when Carl Hutzler ran the place -- and ran it well -- are now well behind them. I didn't always agree with their decisions, but it was obvious that they were working hard and trying to make AOL a good network neighbor, so even when I disagreed I could at least acknowledge their good intentions. It seems now that AOL is determined to permit unlimited abuse directed at the entire rest of the Internet while simultaneously making life as difficult as possible for everyone who *doesn't* abuse...and is counting on their size to make them immune from the consequences of that decision.
---rsk