But to be clear, if this was a simple court case I don't think anyone on this list would have an issue with simply sitting back and letting the court decide. You have to remember though that CI in this case has essentially forced one of the major registrars to virtually shut down. That's a direct attack on the system that is of fundamental importance to the proper running of the Internet. Having the system react strongly to such a threat is entirely understandable. On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:40 AM Sabri Berisha <sabri@cluecentral.net> wrote:
----- On Aug 30, 2021, at 6:29 AM, Rubens Kuhl rubensk@gmail.com wrote:
And that's why carpet bombing those IP blocks might be needed so the next
entity that ends up with those IP addresses long after CI has gone into oblivion will have its engineers debug odd routing issues for years. We all know that people regularly fail to update their manually entered filters on at least a few of their routers.
The learned people on this list do not strike me as the kind of person to go out and engage in vigilante justice if a court decides against them. The very fabric of our civilized society depends on us resolving our conflicts in court, not out on the (virtual) streets. You may disagree with a ruling but I implore you to respect it.
Rules... Without them we'd live with the animals.*
Thanks,
Sabri
*(c) John Wick
-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0