On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Michael Crapse <michael@wi-fiber.io> wrote:
For an eyeball network, you cannot count on an IPv6 only network. Because all of your "customers" will complain because they can't get to hulu, or any other ipv4 only eyeball service. You still need the ipv4s to operate a proper network, and good luck figuring out which services are blacklisting your new /24 because the ipv4 space used to be a VPN provider, and the "in" thing to do for these services is to block VPNs.
There are many IPv6-only eyeball networks. Definitely many examples in wireless (T-Mobile, Sprint, BT ) and wireline (DT with DS-Lite in Germany, Orange Poland ...) and even more where IPv4 NAT44 + IPv6 is used. Just saying, having ipv6 hedges a lot of risk associate with blacklisting and translation related overhead and potentially scale and cost of IPv4 addresses.
On 11 June 2018 at 09:21, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:43 AM Stan Ouchakov <stano@imaginesoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend transfer market brokers for ipv4 addresses? Need clean /24 asap. ARIN's waiting list is too long...
Thanks!
-Stan
Meanwhile, FB reports that 75% of mobiles in the USA reach them via ipv6
https://code.facebook.com/posts/635039943508824/how-ipv6- deployment-is-growing-in-u-s-and-other-countries/
And Akaimai reports 80% of mobiles
https://blogs.akamai.com/2018/06/six-years-since-world-ipv6- launch-entering-the-majority-phases.html
And they both report ipv6 is faster / better.