I agree with you generally.

It's not impossible, but probably unlikely for an individual to be sued for contents of cookie data or similar small fragments like that. 

I do believe it's orders of more magnitude more likely for the 'average' residential consumer to attract a suit from the MPAA/RIAA/etc because there is a torrent stream emanating from their connection, and I have little faith that any provider would go out of their way to jump in front and say 'no no, that's our tech'. 

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 5:15 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:


On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:01 PM Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc> wrote:
I think it would be absolutely *stunning* for content providers 
to turn the model on its head; use a bittorrent like model for 
caching and serving content out of subscribers homes at 
recalcitrant ISPs, so that data doesn't come from outside, 
it comes out of the mesh within the eyeball network, with 
no clear place for the ISP to stick a $$$ bill to.

I'm familiar with some work and ideas that have gone into such a thing, and I'm personally very much against it for non-technical reasons. 

Given how far the law lags behind technology, the last thing anyone should be ok with is a 3rd party storing bits on ANYTHING in their house, or transmitting those bits from a network connection that is registered to them.

*chortle*

So, I take it you steadfastly block *all* cookies from being stored 
or transmitted from your browser at home? 

Oh, wait.  You meant it's OK to let some third parties 
store and transmit bits from your devices, but only 
the ones you like and support, and as long as they're 
small bits, and you're sure there's nothing harmful or 
illegal in them. 

So, that means you check each cookie to make sure 
there's nothing in them that could be illegal?  

You sure someone hasn't tucked something like 
the DeCSS algorithm, or the RSA algorithm into 
a cookie in your browser, like this? 

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Munitions_T-shirt_(front).jpg
https://www.cafepress.com/+,954530397?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=pla-google&utm_campaign=7979505756-d-c&utm_content=83814261273-adid-395151690662&utm_term=pla-1396845372217-pid-954530397&gclid=Cj0KCQjw5JSLBhCxARIsAHgO2SeM10JbFgeus96hEedn0d0m2Kkz6Z91-frlEIUh-3ZD2w89j8EUmCsaAvnAEALw_wcB

The fact of the matter is, every one of us allows 
third parties to store data on all our devices, all 
the time, and send it back out on the network, 
completely unsupervised by us, even though 
it could contain data which is illegal to cross 
certain arbitrary political boundaries. 

I understand where you're coming from, I really 
do. 

But I don't think people stop and think about just 
how completely that ship has sailed, from a legal 
standpoint.  You could have been asked by a random 
website to store code which is illegal to export in a 
cookie which is then offered back up to any other 
website in whatever jurisdiction around the globe 
that asks for it, and you'll be completely unaware 
of it, because we've all gotten past the point of "ask 
me about every cookie" being a workable setting on 
any of our devices.

Go ahead.  Turn off all cookie support on all your devices 
for 24 hours.  Don't let any of that third party data in or out 
of your home during that time. 

Let me know how well that turns out. 

Bonus points if you enforce it on your family/spouse/SO/partner 
at the same time, and they're still talking to you at the end of the 
24 hours.  ;-P 

Matt