Ah. Security hole as designed. inline dispositions should be ignored unless the recipient specifically "requests" to see them after viewing the text/plain part. In fact, I would vote for ignoring *everything* except the text/plain part unless the recipient specifically requests it after viewing the text/plain part. No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews Sent: Friday, 8 May, 2015 00:39 To: Paul Ferguson Cc: NANOG Subject:
In message <mailman.3786.1431050203.12477.nanog@nanog.org>, Paul Ferguson via N ANOG writes:
Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages from the list have been .eml attachments?
Nanog is encapsulating messages that are DKIM signed. Your mailer may not be properly handling
Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline
Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org