I would really appreciate it, as I'm sure may other subscribers of the NANOG would, if you DNS combatants would take this discussion elsewhere, to a more appropriate list. I'm on the verge of constructing filters so that I don't have to see this cruft -- short of that, I'm now considering unsubscribing to the list. The signal/noise ratio has degenerated dramatically. Please remove nanog@merit.edu from the CC: line. - paul At 08:42 AM 05/30/97 -0400, Richard Shu wrote:
Because we're not used to being members of organizations in which major decisions are driven by short-notice ultimatums.
Because we had to act quickly when it became apparent that the root servers were likely to be arbitrarily reloaded with a set of TLDs less than the full set originally registered as eDNS TLDs.
Because we are used to organizations that provide stability and reliability as key elements to foster an environment hospitable to business.
Respectfully submitted, Richard Shu