On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:47:30AM -0800, matt@snark.net said:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Scott Francis wrote:
He argued instead that OSes should be redesigned to implement the principle of least privilege from the ground up, down to the architecture they run on.
[...]
The problem there is the same as with windowsupdate - if one can spoof the central authority, one instantly gains unrestricted access to not one, but myriad computers.
[...]
So far, the closest thing I've seen to this concept is the ssh administrative host model: adminhost:~root/.ssh/id_dsa.pub is copied to every targethost:~root/.ssh/authorized_keys2, such that commands can be performed network-wide from a single station.
Do you even read what you write? How does a host with root access to an entire set of hosts exemplify the least privilege principle?
Your selections from my post managed to obscure the fact that I was making more than one point. I did _not_ state that the ssh key mgmt system outlined above exemplifies least privilege. I was merely making a comparison between that model and the topic under discussion, central administrative/authenticating authorities. Additionally, the section higher up regarding least privilege was in connection with OS design, and was quoted from another author's presentation at ToorCon last year. You're stringing together statements on disparate subjects and then jumping to conclusions. Please do not put words into my mouth.
matto
--mghali@snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
-- -= Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net =- GPG key CB33CCA7 has been revoked; I am now 5537F527 illum oportet crescere me autem minui