What makes you think that companies are going to spend money and time on your “solution” when they’re having to be dragged kicking and screaming to fully enable IPv6 to every endpoint on their networks?  

Most places already OWN IPv6 capable routers/equipment, they’re just either being lazy in setting it up (“no reason to” excuse) or there’s not enough customer demand for them to take the time.

You don’t seem to have a firm grasp on WHY IPv6 adoption is taking so long. 

Sent from my iPad

On May 13, 2020, at 5:15 PM, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:


A degree in economics is not needed to know that if the damages of something is causing x2 the amount that can be spent to avoid the damages - then half of the amount should be spent.
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:09 AM
To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io>
Cc: Shane Ronan <shane@ronan-online.com>; North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
 
Peace,

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 2:04 AM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
> [..] for example if spoofed DDoS amplification attacks are
> causing yearly damages of $100M per year in the world
> and these EOL equipment cost $50M in the world, it
> might be worth to replace them)

What's your degree in economics?  Is it an MBA, and if yes, then where?

Quite frankly, when it comes to your biography published on the
candidates page, we honestly don't even know if you're even succeeded
in primary school.  There's nothing telling about this.

What engineering experience do you have?

--
Töma