If you don't mind OpenDNS proxying all your Google searches, sure. < http://blog.metasploit.com/2008/07/on-dns-attacks-in-wild-and-journalistic.h... > Personally, I would never use OpenDNS. Tactics like that are not particularly acceptable in my book, well-meaning or not. Not, however, trying to start a political debate - but OpenDNS does do a bit more than just act as a plain DNS resolver for you, and you should make that aware to anyone who uses it. - S -----Original Message----- From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:hannigan@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:13 AM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Gadi Evron; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony: Metasploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd) Not so quick. Privacy policy? -M< On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although I doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
Note: HD has not been compromised.
Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's the time to see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com