Elad, It's those kinds of quick accusations that are damaging your reputation. To boil your three ideas down to a sentence, they're throwing pixie dust on top of existing technologies, instead of embracing the current feature set that has existed for decades. I mentioned BCP38 as a method around spoofed DDOS attacks on RIPE, and your IPv4+ idea is only keeping IPv4 around longer than it should. IPv6 has been around for decades, and battle tested with major companies like Digital Equipment Corporation in the 90's. If you want your ideas to gain any sort of foothold, write the code demonstrating a proof of concept with a couple of Linux VMs, showing off the client and router changes, and release it for the community to play around with. Actions speak louder than words. Just like RIPE votes, and listing your email address as spam. Have a good one. Ryan Hamel On May 13 2020, at 2:39 pm, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:35 PM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
Another member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project".
wait, what?
________________________________ From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:34 AM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> Cc: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>; nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
admins, can we can this worm can back and .. get back to work ? kthxbi.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:29 PM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be deployed. ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4 because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traf...
Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as IPv6.
Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to abandon the work already done?