Just a quick update to the below message, I have a contact for The Planet, if anyone has a contact for any of the following, would be much appreciated: 64.167.200.160/29 (SBCIS-1001120-113647) [new] 213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL) 193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET) 65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0) Many thanks, Gavin -----Original Message----- From: Gavin Pearce [mailto:Gavin.Pearce@3seven9.com] Sent: 15 March 2011 11:48 To: NANOG list Subject: 213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18 Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following: Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months ago). *sigh* Getting multiple brute force and/or spam from single IPs within those ranges against different devices on different dates. Gav -----Original Message----- From: Masato YAMANISHI [mailto:myamanis@japan-telecom.com] Sent: 14 March 2011 16:16 To: 'Marshall Eubanks'; 'NANOG list' Subject: RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Hi Marshall and all,
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true. Rgs, Masato
-----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme@americafree.tv] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
In this WSJ article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999 52421569210.html
or
This caught my eye :
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Regards Marshall