>>>>> They forgot to mention that it's technically possible to filter
>>>>> advertisements from their customer. Which apparently they were/are
>>>>> not really doing.
>>>>
>>>> luckily, CT is the only isp not doing good filtering, or we would
>>>> be having mis-originations and route leaks every day. oh, wait.
>>>
>>> Perhaps what you meant to say here was:
>>
>> “Then you should say what you mean,” the March Hare went on.
>>
> I know. I guess my point was: "Hey, maybe now we can get people's
> attention?"
my point is that over 20 years of continuing mis-originations and leaks
seem not to move the needle very far. heck, you were jacked/leaked
maybe ten or so days ago in about the same way you were jacked/leaked
some time back. and you will be again.
and those mean, nasty, godless, commie, ... chinese have no worse
hygiene than 94.3% of the internet. non-chinese just love to get
hysterical and accusatory when some prc isp does what almost everyone
else is doing multiple times a day.
and focusing on china telecom is a red herring, because damned near
everyone leaks. and it is the everyone who has to change. doughnut,
hole.
randy
Never waste a good outage to get buy-in for resources to get something good done.
And if you have to pull that natsec fire alarm to move rpki to enforcing or dropping networks with repeated bad hygiene, so be it