On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 03:23:43PM -0800, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Karl Denninger wrote: Here's the listing from the last TWO HOURS off the top of those logs:
228 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica 193 newsgroup alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc 189 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.oral 175 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cartoons 151 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.orientals 150 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.breasts 148 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur 146 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.boys 134 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.female 132 newsgroup alt.binaries.erotica 129 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.female 116 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.panties 115 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blondes 112 newsgroup alt.binaries.games 108 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.redheads 108 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.female.anal 108 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.bisexuals 107 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pornstar 105 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pornstars 105 newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.black.erotic.females 104 newsgroup alt.test.testing 103 newsgroup alt.sex.pictures 102 newsgroup alt.sex.erotica
Any questions?
193 newsgroup alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc is the only one I see that looks like it meets the criteria you normally spout. The rest are simply banned because you don't like the idea of carrying pictures of possibly naked people.
This is getting off-topic for NANOG - I've said my last on the issue here.
Really? Promise? That would be really nice. Perhaps we could get back to operational issues and take this discussion to alt.prudes? --- David Miller ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do!