Hmm; if they need to run 2000 VLAN's, they do not need L3 routing in every box... Of course, if they want L3 routing on every box (I do not like such idea, but it's possible), then 3550 (or what do they have now?) is the best choice. But I am very suspicious about such design... in 99% cases, 4,000 VLAn,s and 100 24-port switches means _bad network / solution schema_. If use other (non Cisco) switches - it may be very good choice in getting low price, but it requires long and careful testing. My experience is strictly asgainst non-cisco devices in such areas, as - VoIP, IP routing, L2 / L3 switches/routers (and almost the same in switches). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:40 PM Subject: Re: Any 1U - 2U Ethernet switches that can handle 4K VLANs?
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
1) Use Cisco 2924 or 3524
Didnt you mean 2950 and 3550?
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se