Re: What must one do to avoid Gmail's retarded non-spam filtering?

Erik L wrote:

Received-SPF: pass ... Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass ...

So the problem is unlikely to be a SPF issue, as mentioned in my first e-mail.

http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html The lack of SPF records should never be the reason to block an email. It's about time SPF is being laid to rest, it's broken, ineffective and a flawed concept. Well, it's effective in legitimising spammers and breaking forwarding for example, but otherwise... -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html