Well that shows my assertion was probably wrong. 

Given the geopolitical situation between the US and China, along with certain government orders, could likely infer this is intentional. 

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:33 PM Paul Rolland <rol@witbe.net> wrote:
Hello,

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> wrote:

> I looked at this a little last night, but didn't have time to write an
> email about it.  Verizon has a lookingglass:
>
> https://www.verizon.com/business/why-verizon/looking-glass/
>
> which you can use to see that Verizon has no route covering 182.61.200.0.
> Looking at routeviews, I see routes for 182.61.200.0/22,
> and 182.61.200.0/21, but no path via Verizon.

Just tested using:
  Region: Asia Pacific
  Location: HKG
  Show BGP route
  Net: 182.61.200.0

and the answer is:

182.61.200.0/22 (2 entries, 1 announced)
        *BGP    Preference: 170/-101
                Age: 4w0d 22:32:07      Metric: 10      Metric2: 500502
                Announcement bits (4): 0-KRT 3-RT 8-BGP_RT_Background 9-Resolve tree 4
                AS path: (65336) 4134 23724 38365 I  (Atomic Originator)
                Communities:   
                Localpref: 100

Paul