Hey Mike. Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :) Best, -M< On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:21 AM <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh spiffy!
Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then.
-Mike
On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson <brett@the-watsons.org> wrote:
Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :)
bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;cia.gov. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION: cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a22-66.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a16-67.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a1-22.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a12-65.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net. cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net.
On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It certainly is.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is Akamized...
-Mike
On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <mis@seiden.com> wrote:
of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
(i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet. “russiar, are you listening?”)
(i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a hash.)
i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and malware inserted that are distributed as well.
and i’ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed that way. On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, wrote:
And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay.
Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-) More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses, amd-64 Branch prediction. Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for hypervisors
And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole thing to a a screeching halt
On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved
ways
of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot
insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically:
Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow.
In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the
TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-)
We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet.
Frederick Wessling (CIO) Succinct Systems LLC Cell: +1(561) 571-2799 Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925 Fax: +1(904) 758-9987 www.SuccinctSystems.com <http://www.succinctsystems.com/>