On 6/3/23 4:01 PM, William Herrin wrote:
It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :) It's been a while and the article is light on the facts of the case, but IIRC what happened was: RIAA made some DMCA complaints to Cox. Cox decided that since they were the network rather than the host, they couldn't "remove" the offending material, wouldn't cut the user's access and, because they have such respect for customer privacy, wouldn't tell the RIAA who the customers were unless RIAA subpoenaed
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:51 PM Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote: them under a John Doe suit.
The court decided that Cox's behavior was sufficient to waive the DMCA's liability shield for Internet providers and off they went to trial.
How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or something? Mike