-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/14/2011 17:43, Tim Wilde wrote:
On a serious note, though, really, what DOES it say about the real-world maturity / actual chances of adoption for IPv6 that Charles' statement above is, in fact, true?
Someone else has already pointed out the relationship of IPv6 now to IPv4 20 years ago, but at the risk of flogging the horse what I get from this is that what we're suffering from is a lack of operational experience, combined with the fact that a significant percentage of the early adopters have at least one toe in the "zealot" pool. :) It's also worth pointing out that even today in IPv4 TI(still)MTOWTDI. Witness the recent IS-IS vs. OSPF thread; or any of the other recurring IPv4-only topics. If you think about it, this is a feature. If there was only one right answer the world-wide market for network engineers would be a lot smaller than it is now. Doug - -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOStUcAAoJEFzGhvEaGryExSoH/2kPPpcR7zTi+HsyYsZ5xbIP 8G3g5/rfi8WAbhNjEzOY+vr+5vQwC02KNxgNdpmemrXEahgq9Na8I8rxT7+GjjUw atZx7Fx6k3uvmdubWOCRn0G0CQ36eq7QHEt4jS2SkzDzC0TF7aWiw8MNxd6FbLv3 Bb7zs/eKut9uO32W+TpWMv2AbN46G6Xjt3lWzWwTzWSuM3MK8FaMR52ZyssLJxnG LfyLGDRUgER2Q7uNvxIeqaGsX87qtpM2SZb7c0kVfxqUnM7vSLcvSHOpuI2R39AJ BkBS+ViDbg30tdhNtC03Brmk6uHBEhLf+aH+1+4b2i3GfS1iG0nNHJP2Lf4Ud5M= =9PGM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----