12 Jul
2009
12 Jul
'09
9:28 p.m.
Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing? Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick.
Ivan
We currently do exactly that - dropping anything longer than a /23 with default routes to cover anything missing. Since were replacing the routers anyway I would prefer to have the capacity to do things correctly rather than what, at least to me, seems a kludge. It is a very workable solution - just not one I am completely comfortable with. -- Mark Radabaugh Amplex 419.837.5015 x21 mark@amplex.net