(A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-) jamie On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Geraint Jones <geraint@koding.com> wrote:
Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :) -- Geraint Jones
On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" <richard@pedantictheory.com> wrote:
*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years?
~Richard
On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschlassa@gmail.com> wrote:
Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers. It is basically SPAM and of course nonsense.
The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on us is rediculous.
If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and two use a different email. On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstuppi@cisco.com> wrote:
Thanks folks. Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and v6.
Thanks, John
"We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone."
John Stuppi, CISSP Technical Leader Strategic Security Research jstuppi@cisco.com Phone: +1 732 516 5994 Mobile: 732 319 3886
CCIE, Security - 11154 Cisco Systems Mail Stop INJ01/2/ 111 Wood Avenue South Iselin, New Jersey 08830 United States Cisco.com
Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
-----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM To: Henri Wahl Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6
I'm seeing it down via IPv6:
* Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90... * Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0)
GET / HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.30.0 Host: www.cisco.com Accept: */*
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK * Server Apache is not blacklisted
* About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0) * Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178... ^C
- Jared
On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.wahl@ifw-dresden.de> wrote:
Hi, can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com (2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6? Regards
-- Henri Wahl
IT Department Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u. Werkstoffforschung Dresden
tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797 email: h.wahl@ifw-dresden.de http://www.ifw-dresden.de
Nagios status monitor Nagstamon: http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de
DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d: http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de
IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr. 1369 Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle <0x1FBA0942.asc>
-- "sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants." - Forbes If voting didn't matter, the GOP wouldn't make it more difficult than buying a gun. /* - teh jamie. ; uri -> http://about.me/jgr */