29 Oct
2002
29 Oct
'02
10:11 a.m.
Agreed 100%, but Gov't (being run by lawyers) is well accustomed to defining what the meaning of 'is' is. If they dictate that ISPs employ "DDoS Protection", they will define what "DDoS Protection" means 'for the purposes of this policy'.
ah ok the point I was trying to make is, there are steps that can be taken to mitigate/reduce the affects of DDoS. I do not believe there is any complete way to "protect against a DDoS". perhaps I'm just being pedantic. perhaps the clarity you mention would be a good thing for other areas too :)