12 Mar
2003
12 Mar
'03
8:35 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's peer the next hop after cw's peer.
I just tried the trace again and it seems better.
Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)