That number is still too high since some people are advertising their /25 to /32 prefixes to the route-views box.. Kris
-----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.Nether.net] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:47 PM To: Robert Boyle Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size?
I was going off my data analysis of route-views data.
wc -l oix.home_as.out 135949 oix.home_as.out
this file has prefix:home_asn
(where home_asn is the last asn in the as_path. prefixes with inconsistent home_as will appear twice. this may be cause of some of your confusion. eliminating those brings it to 120131 prefixes)
- jared
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:37:09PM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 11:26 AM 7/18/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Hmm.
We don't filter, and
112942 network entries and 391859 paths using 25288182
bytes of memory
We don't filter either and...
117800 network entries and 339843 paths using 23660948
bytes of memory
"about 135k prefixes last i checked." is not what we see
here from any of
our upstreams.
-Robert
Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211 "Good will, like a good name, is got by many actions, and lost by one." - Francis Jeffrey
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.