19 Oct
2007
19 Oct
'07
12:24 p.m.
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:48:57 EDT, Leo Bicknell said:
In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule?
Why would the 240/4 updates blow the schedule?
More code, more regression testing, same number of programmers. Do the math. Take it as a given that it *will* slip the schedule some amount, because the resources for a 240/4 feature will have to come from somewhere. So how much slippage are you willing to accept?