Sean, as you know, typical SLAs provide very limited compensation for missing a deadline. It seems to me that most SLAs are crafted from the faith that normally circuits will be up a very high percentage of the time, and of the time that its down, it might not be down due to a circuit failure, and of those times it is a circuit failure, a customer may not notice/request an SLA-based compensation. Further, in my limited experience, SLAs are rarely actually paid for by providers (i.e. it never clears accounting). Good marketing though. Deepak Jain AiNET (This is not meant to refer to any specific provider). On 3 Sep 2000, Sean Donelan wrote:
The Michigan Public Service Commission has launched an investigation into Ameritech's service quality. According to Ameritech, in August the estimated average repair time will be 115 hours (almost 5 days). Significantly up over previous years' average repair times of about a day (25-28 hours).
http://www.cis.state.mi.us/mpsc/comm/ameritech.htm
What I find interesting isn't Ameritech's long repair times, but how do providers promise 4 hour repair times when the dominant local loop provider takes over a day to fix something on a good day.