Yes. It can also be configured to do a variety of other things, and send all sorts of malformed information. It just takes time, patience, skill, and desire to configure it to do so. It also happens to be how some vendors, and providers, involved in this debacle confirmed the issue. .chance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Joe Abley Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:01 PM To: Richard A. Steenbergen Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:38:28PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
What BGP acceptance tests do people currently run against
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:43:35PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote: prospective
vendors' hardware?
QA Robot
Does that expose the RFC3065 issue if you run it against vendor C's implementations?
Joe