On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:14:57PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
There are many cases where ULA is a perfect fit, and to work around it seems silly and reduces the full capabilities of IPv6. I fully expect to see protocols and networks within homes which will take full advantage of ULA. I also expect to see hosts which don't talk to the public internet directly and never need a GUA.
I guess we can agree to disagree about this. I haven't seen one yet.
What would your recommended solution be then for disconnected networks? Every home user and enterprise user requests GUA directly from their RIR/NIR/LIR at a cost of hunderds of dollars per year or more?
You might be asking the wrong person for advice or reasoning. Horses for courses. ULAs have a place. Cameron