I'm not complaining about the volume or diversity, just trying to help solve the concerns of those that are.
That said, officially allowing some of the other types of conversation would likely increase the volume and diversity. How much, who knows?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
To: "Rod Beck" <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com>
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 1:06:10 PM
Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not
need to fix that.
randy
---
randy@psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy@psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery