On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:38 AM, ML wrote:
At least not without some painful rebuilds of criticals systems which have these IPs deeply embedded in their configs.
They shouldn't be using IP addresses in configs, they should be using DNS names. Time to bite the bullet and get this fixed prior to their eventual forced migration to IPv6.
Somebody should tell the nytimes.com about this being a bad practice, many of their images are linked to ip addresses directly and will certainly fail in the future (this year, mobile) networks that will use NAT64/DNS64. I am sure users will find other places to view their news when nytimes.com fails to work in these ipv6-only networks. Small summary of the problem of IPv4 literals and how they will break in certain IPv6 environments that will be deployed this year http://groups.google.com/group/ipv4literals Cameron ========= http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta =========
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.
-- Alan Kay