On Sep 18, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
In John's case (on behalf of ARIN as is befitting his role) he welcomes change as long as it's funneled through the ARIN-managed channels. In other words, change is welcome as long as it reinforces ARIN's role as facilitator.
Benson - By "ARIN-managed channels", do you mean via mechanisms that were established by those elected by the ARIN membership"? I do indeed believe that efforts to change ARIN should be directed to through the channels that are overseen by member-elected ARIN Advisory Council and member-elected ARIN Board of Trustees. E.g., if you want to change ARIN policies, then there is the ARIN PDP (Policy Development Process) which is open to anyone and driven by the ARIN Advisory Council. The process is well documented and allows input from the entire community including public polls of support for policy changes by both onsite remote participants of the Public Policy Meeting (PPM). Similarly, if you want to change the scope of ARIN's mission or fees or our operational tasking, you can talk to the members of the Board of Trustees who are unpaid volunteers elected by the ARIN membership. Engaging from "within the system" definitely means working via channels that operate or are defined by member-elected bodies of the system. I don't think you could have any meaningful self-governance in any model without this occurring (but would welcome examples of good models of governance if you have any counter-examples) However, your statement that I only welcome change funneled through "ARIN-managed channels" is incorrect, as I have made it quite plain on multiple occasions that the structure of the Internet number registry system itself is not necessarily a discussion that should be held within the existing structure (e.g. RIRs and ICANN), but might also be appropriately held external to the existing structure (such as by operator forums or the Internet Governance Forum). I believe that the community is must always be able to engage in multi-stakeholder self-governance discussions, and that does not imply ARIN having any unique role in facilitation. Such a perspective (of welcoming discussion in any forum) is perfectly befitting my role at ARIN and not in conflict as you seem to imply, as my job is to make sure that the mission of community-led Internet number resource management is fulfilled, not the promotion any specific organizational model for accomplishing the task. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN