30 Jan
2019
30 Jan
'19
6:36 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2019 at 23:10 AM Ren Provo <ren.provo@gmail.com> wrote:
You probably should remove sessions with networks explicitly *not* participating in route servers versus displaying them on a global shame list.
And so it begins — yet another discussion on what does the word "responsibility" really mean. Given that e.g. the peering facility in Amazon, according to an adjacent NANOG ML thread, is in deep deep trouble since Nov 2018, just shutting down sessions with all of the entries in that shame list is likely to cause huge disruption and disappoinment. -- Töma