20 Oct
2010
20 Oct
'10
9:53 p.m.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:46:34 -0700 Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
On 10/20/2010 6:20 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
To make it clear, as it seems to be quite misunderstood, you'd have both ULA and global addressing in your network.
Right. Just like to multihome with IPv6 you would have both PA addresses from provider #1 and PA addresses from provider #2 in your network.
Only nobody wants to do that either.
So you speak for everybody? I can do that too. Nobody wants to run NAT anymore either.