14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
7:12 p.m.
On 11/14/2011 4:21 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
For the common good it doesn't matter if the "NAT is good" guys are right or the "NAT is useless" guys are right, as they both fail to decrease the numbers of their opposing parts. We must get IPv6 done for both of them.
Hehehe... depending on your ISPs / transit providers / border technology level, putting critical infrastructure on IPv6[only] might be the safest most unreachable network of all :) Jeff