31 Jan
2002
31 Jan
'02
12:03 p.m.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:57:38 PST, "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com> said:
Based upon the general desire for providers to have NAT'ed users and to reduce IP-space usage where appropriate, does this make sense? I can understand the providers desire to increase revenue, but I don't believe this is a good way to do it.
Which do you resemble more? Dilbert, or his pointy-haired boss? Which does the person who made this business decision resemble more? Yes, it sounds like a dumb idea, if it's true (which I haven't seen supported yet). -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech