My personal opinion is that _some_ bitnet issues are indeed relevant to the NANOG list, but that's just me. :-) I mean, it _does_ affect network ops at times... - ferg -- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling@packetloss.biz> wrote: Dear Fergie, On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +0000, Fergie wrote:

For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:

General information about the mailing list is at:

http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets

thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull, when urgent matters concerning botnets will still discussed on the nanog-list? Please let me disabussed to it, but it's just my opinion. Regards Thomas

- ferg

-- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling@packetloss.biz> wrote:

Dear all,

On So, 2006-08-13 at 15:17 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:

...

Interestingly enough, I lurk here 99.999% of the time. I comment on this thread and folks ask to move it to a non-SP mailing list? Perhaps non-operational, but this certainly has direct implications on SPs and I'm of the opinion it's quite relevant - well, certainly as relevant as the past recent threads:

i waited to view, where this discussion will go, but that's exactly the point. In my opinion, it's really interesting and necessary to be informed about topics like botnets. It would be a failure, when this topics won't be discussed anylonger on this list. Also it isn't that a big problem, to filter topics for himself for relevance or of no relevance.

Just my two cents.

Regards Thomas Kuehling

-- Thomas Kuehling - TK2325-RIPE Hoehestrasse 28 - 61348 Bad Homburg vor der Höhe - Hessen Jahnstrasse 6 - 26219 Boesel - Niedersachsen

-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/