Kai Schlichting <kai@pac-rim.net> writes:
How sure are you, beyond just the usual nan(og|ae) idle chatter? BT is much better off than some ISPs I can think of. I do happen to know they have a few good people in there working for them. If the guy is asking for DNSBLs to use, and you have some good ones in mind, help him, I'd say. --srs -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
If the guy is asking for DNSBLs to use, and you have some good ones in mind, help him, I'd say.
Here Here Suresh, you're on the money! If they (BT) really have that big of a problem, one could look at this as a sign that they want to see what effect its had on their network, and they might *GHASP* fix it. Rather than pointing fingers and attacking, help the poor guy!
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
There are? SORBS has been listing BT for some time now because of the continual stream of spam to the spamtraps, and first contact was made within the last 7 days - and from memory that mail appear to be a bit of throwing ones weight around (which doesn't wash with me at all - everyone is treated the same, and if I am treated with respect I treat others with respect).
If the guy is asking for DNSBLs to use, and you have some good ones in mind, help him, I'd say.
I agree, though based on the recent communication I wonder whether someone is after finding out whether they should be able to safely ignore lists such as mine ... ;-/ Yours Mat PS: If there are BT staffers here with clout, you might want to contact me over the listings. Noone is exempt from listing in SORBS, but proven whitehats don't get blocked.
participants (3)
-
Matthew Sullivan -
Suresh Ramasubramanian -
Tom (UnitedLayer)