Hi all, Someone posted to r/networking about QUIC that raised a question for me. Is anyone, proprietary or not, looking at AQM for QUIC? We have line rate MAC-Sec and ASIC level IPSec is on the way. I mean, if I'm an application owner and I want the pipe, why wouldn't I just take it all with my unfair UDP flows? Thanks, Google! Jason
Just drop it and it will failover to TCP? Or just police it like normal flows? I heard its addaptive... ---------- Original message ---------- From: Jason Iannone via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Cc: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone@gmail.com> Subject: AQM for QUIC HTTP/3 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:34:08 -0500 Hi all, Someone posted to r/networking about QUIC that raised a question for me. Is anyone, proprietary or not, looking at AQM for QUIC? We have line rate MAC-Sec and ASIC level IPSec is on the way. I mean, if I'm an application owner and I want the pipe, why wouldn't I just take it all with my unfair UDP flows? Thanks, Google! Jason _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/OBFENPXX...
participants (2)
-
borg@uu3.net -
Jason Iannone