Mailman deals with DKIM fine. It’s all in the setup. — Sent from my iPad

On Mar 3, 2025, at 18:39, Don Gould <don@bowenvale.co.nz> wrote:

 Lol... all I can say is "Welcome back NANOG!" :)

I see nothing has changed.

99.9% edited their rule. 0.1% complained about the interruption to normal programming.... and my inbox is full of noise.

As for DKIM etc. It's a bit like the endless whois debate in my region that results in the tool becoming less useful.

*sigh*

D - 55 this year... /etc/init.d/grumpy restart

-- Don Gould 5 Cargill Place Richmond 8013 Christchurch, New Zealand Mobile/Telegram: + 64 21 114 0699 www.bowenvale.co.nz

-------- Original message -------- From: Joel Esler via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> Date: 4/03/25 12:13 pm (GMT+12:00) To: nanog@lists.nanog.org Cc: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>, nanog@lists.nanog.org, Joel Esler <joel@joelesler.net> Subject: [NANOG] Re: DKIM and list policies (was Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished)

I know! I had to update my rules too! Was wondering why all the list traffic was finding its way into my inbox.

— Sent from my iPad

...

On Mar 3, 2025, at 15:50, Vinny Abello via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org> wrote:

On 3/3/2025 2:28 PM, Sam Thomas via NANOG wrote:

...

Surprised I'm the first (I know of) to complain that List-id: changed. (insert whining about how I had to adjust email filter here)

<whining> I just had to update my procmail config to match the new list-id. </whining>

I've been complaining (in my head) since it changed when each message came in from the list, if that counts.

_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/LRXQ2Z3K... <OpenPGP_signature.asc>

---

NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/O3FE77O5...