Next-hop Reachability on ATM NAPs
            
            
            
                14 May
                
                    2001
                
            
            
                14 May
                
                '01
                
            
            
            
        
    
                9:22 p.m.
            
        NANOG members, I have a question to the group regarding how best to avoid blackholing routes to peers on an ATM NAP when using route servers. There is a case wherein my peering partner and I both have active PVCs to the route servers, but the PVC between my peering partner and my router is down. Thus, we both see routes from the route server with each other's IP as next-hop, but since our direct PVC is down that next-hop is no good. It'd like a way to automatically and efficiently detect loss of next-hop and discard routes accordingly. Are folks generally using OAM keepalives, and if so, any parameters for OAM interval time and dead/alive count that seem practical? Thanks, -- Reid Knuttila Network Engineer Onvoy
        8940
        
      
          Age (days ago)
        
      
        8940
        
    
          Last active (days ago)
        
        
        
        0 comments
    
    
        
        1 participants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    participants (1)
- 
                
Reid Knuttila