Mea culpa: I meant "a few /16's" as opposed to "2"... No flames, it's too late... - ferg -- "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net> wrote: Philip, This sounds very much like a bully -- 2 /16's are a major problem, as opposed to a single /8? Where is the major heartburn in this particlualr case? I could understand if here were lots of farctured annnounced space (granted: I haven't checked this yet), but what's up with that? - ferg -- Philip Smith <pfs@cisco.com> wrote: mkawano@bb.softbank.co.jp said the following on 4/8/05 12:03: FWIW, if you don't announce your aggregate, do not be surprised if you experience continued disconnectivity to many parts of the Internet. Some SPs notice that SoftbankBB have received 126/8, so will likely filter as such. Leaking sub-prefixes may be fine for traffic engineering, but this generally only works best if you include a covering aggregate. Try including your /8 announcement and see if this improves reachability for you. Out of curiosity, why pick on a /16 for traffic engineering? Most people tend to analyse traffic flows and pick the appropriate address space size as a subdivision. Or do you have 256 links to upstream ISPs and need that level of fine-tuning? best wishes, philip